WKYT HOME ·  WYMT HOME ·  STATION INFO ·  CONTACT US
News  ·   Blogs  ·   .com Daily  ·   Classifieds  ·   Programming  ·   Employment  ·   Political  ·   Money  ·   Community  ·   Contests  ·   Entertainment
Central Ky Weather · Eastern Ky Weather · Weather Maps · WKYT Sports · WYMT Sports · CW · Recipes · Auto · Health · CBS Shows · Track Sex Offenders · · Project Green
Online Poll Question
How often do you and your family eat dinner out?

Every night
At least three times a week
At least twice a week
At least once a week
At least once a month
Rarely
Never


The Polls Submitted By
WKYT
Suggest An Online Poll

Countdown To Digital TV

until February 17, 2009, the official transition from analog to digital television.
Tell Me More

FCC Reports


Abused Horses Returned To Owners Save Email Print
Posted: 10:32 PM May 7, 2008
Last Updated: 8:18 AM May 8, 2008
Reporter: Andy Cunningham
Email Address: andy.cunningham@wkyt.com

A | A | A

For more than a month Kim Hurst helped nurse dozens of malnourished horses back to health. But now, the Jessamine County Humane Society president is frustrated some of those animals are back with their owners.

We first told you about the raid at a Jessamine County farm back in March. Animal control officers seized 74 horses found in poor condition. Twelve days ago a judge allowed the farm owners to take 25 horses back a move that outraged the Jessamine County Humane Society.

"We took care of these animals for 30 days and spent thousands of dollars on them, then their owner's came in and just took the one's they wanted," said Kim Hurst.

Hurst admits it is becoming extremely difficult to find the funds to take care of the animals. They are still caring for six horses from a previous case.

"We just need some help, we can't continue to take on more animals without it," Hurst said. She goes on to say the real problem is irresponsible breeding and poor management.

"We've known for sometime the horse market isn't good, so if you can't afford to care for the animals you have, why would you continue to breed," Hurst said.

Hurst says the owners took 24 of the 74 horses, "They took the cream of the crop and left the county with the financial burden to find a home for the remaining horses," Hurst said.

The owners, who declined comment, were charged with 74 counts of animal cruelty. However, the courts said if the horses that were returned to them remain in a healthy state after one year, those charges will be dropped.

The Jessamine County Humane Society says a few years ago they faced a similar crisis and donations were five times more than what they've received this time.

More Stories
Police Discover Meth Labs After Dog Attack

Boyle County Sheriff Patrols Cut Back

Driver Trapped In Truck By Live Wires

Man Indicted In High Profile Double Murder

Project Green: Zap Cars Waiting For Approval

Environmental Concerns After Junkyard Fire

KSU Employees To Get 2 Percent Raise

Senior Citizen Charged With Rape Of 4-Year-Old

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Bill on May 10, 2008 at 06:55 AM
you want more forfeiture laws.when you see people having properity taken, for any reason the state wants, across Ky.No man or goverment should have forfeiture laws,in a free country.forfeiture is just a tool of Ky's something for nothing democrats.

Posted by: Goebel Location: Lexington on May 9, 2008 at 08:04 AM
This is the dumbest thing I have heard in a long time. The owner should be bared from owning any animal.

Posted by: Ty Location: Frankfort on May 8, 2008 at 08:41 PM
Where's PETA in all of this? They got all upset about one horse dying from what they called abuse, but they are silent when people who nearly starved 74 to death get those horses back? Activists do the darndest things.

Posted by: Teri Location: Richmond on May 8, 2008 at 03:34 PM
This so called "judge" should have ordered the owner to either pay full restitution to the Humane Society for the care of the horses AND kept the fines and charges for each count of animal cruelty intact OR the owner should have forfeited ALL the animals to the Humane Society so they could adopt out the animals and attempt to recoup some of the thousands of dollars they spent....AND...the owner of the horses should be prevented from owning horses for two years. This is the STANDARD plea deal right now in Kentucky for horse neglect cases....the judge certainly went against the grain. Very unfortunate. It sounds like someone knew someone, in my opinion. The real problem is that animals are considered "property" under Kentucky law and there is no forfeiture laws in place "yet" for abused animals. Usually the owners are just fined heavily and ordered to pay the restitution so the owner surrenders the animals in effort to get a break on the fines in a plea. This owner got off escott free!

Posted by: Melissa Location: Lexington on May 8, 2008 at 02:57 PM
Where is PETA for this case! I think that they are wasting their efforts in the wrong places, and they need to be focusing on where it really needs to be!

Posted by: Darlene Location: KY on May 8, 2008 at 02:16 PM
To "Horse Owner" of KY. Defend the selfish people. I dont care what you or anyone else says, the system is messed up. I agree these people should first pay all cost back to the people who took care of HIS/HER animals becuse they couldn't and then they should have to proove that they can afford to feed and take care of other animals before having the poor horses back. Of course someone better be talking to the judge, seems he/she is as bad off as these people. Maybe they are all related someway or another!

Posted by: Ondine Location: Indiana on May 8, 2008 at 01:05 PM
sierra got it exactly right. If these abusive owners can afford to care for the horses returned to them, then they can afford to reimburse the Humane Society for the costs to care for the other horses that were removed from their property. This is a ridiculous ruling that does not serve the best interests of the horses or the citizens of Jessamine County.

Posted by: sam Location: berea on May 8, 2008 at 12:29 PM
People shouldn't be so judgemental of others. The owners shouldn't have to repay the humane society. We have laws that protect animals and we also have laws tht protect people. These people were not found guilty of any wrong doing. Remember, it's innocent until proven guilty. They are not guilty just because the media made it seem that way.

Posted by: Wow Location: NKY on May 8, 2008 at 12:09 PM
Judge...that would be an oxymoron in this case. How can a judge be allowed to rule and judge these horses back to their original owners??? We need stronger animal rights in this state known for animals.

Posted by: sierra Location: lexington on May 8, 2008 at 11:01 AM
Why isn't the owner being required to reimburse the Jessamine County humane society for the care and treatment cost of these horses. If this judge thinks they can now afford to properly care for 24 horses then they can afford to repay the humane society. I don't know what this judge was thinking, these nuts will probably try to breed the horses returned to them and in about 2 years the police and humane society will be right back out there rescuing poor animals again. Kentucky's law's on animal cruelty are absurd, it still amazes me that there were people who fought against "Romeo's Law". We need similar laws to protect our horses-the "Horse Capital of the World" should be ashamed that our laws and sadly our judges are so inadequate.

Posted by: confused Location: pikeville on May 8, 2008 at 08:05 AM
How can a judge do this? If more get neglected or die, what will the judge do then or how will he feel? Will the judge feel responsible in some way? Maybe if faced with this circumstance again, we should hand the judge and the horse owner a shovel and let the two of them start digging graves for the animals...

Posted by: Horse Owner Location: Ky on May 8, 2008 at 07:16 AM
As a horse owner I think it would be good to mention that if you have a 100 animals and treast them all the same and feed them the same for years, some look better than others. SOme of these horses were healthy. Some genetics and immune systems are weaker than others allowing some of these horses to get worms or other diseases that didn't allow them to put on the weight like everyone thinks. The animal buisness is a science maybe the guy should have culled out these poorer horses but then they would soon be dog food. I myself put in effort to bring them back to health instead of sending them to purina. It takes time and the horses I saw on TV were none ready for death. Think of the people you graduated with. Most all of you were fed and now some of you aren't so healthy same thing just horses can't get medicaid.

Posted by: MIke Location: Covington on May 8, 2008 at 06:56 AM
I think the Judge should go and live with the family for a year and see how he is treated. Giving these animals back just shows the ignorance and apathy in the judical system. I can only hope a horse kicks the judge in the head and knocks some sense into him.

Posted by: Anonymous Location: Versailles, kentucky on May 8, 2008 at 06:14 AM
Smart move judge, very smart!! It is apparent they can't take care of there horses so let's give them back to them. I get sick of hearing all this crap!!!! These horses will end up dead!! They had a chance and the judge ruined that.

Posted by: Deniece Location: Lexington. on May 8, 2008 at 05:51 AM
Whatever Judge that gave those horses back to those people should have to go without food or water for 30 days. He has surely never been hungry. And PETA, where are they? Too caught up worrying about needless matters? You would think if they were so concerned about animals they would contribute to the care of those horses. I am outraged the horses have been returned!!

Posted by: lou Location: ky on May 8, 2008 at 05:16 AM
When someone is charged with animal cruelty,74 counts,How can they ever own animal again? They should never be allow to own any animal!

AP Video Breaking News
Search Our Video Archives
WKYT Archives
Video search:


WYMT Archives
Video search:


Sponsored Headlines