Courtroom Video Of Woman Jailed Wearing "Really Short" Shorts Released
Courtroom Video Of Woman Jailed Wearing "Really Short" Shorts Released Save Email Print
Posted: 11:33 PM Aug 21, 2008
 Last Updated: 4:37 PM Aug 25, 2008
172 comments Poll
A | A | A

Showing too much skin landed a Garrard County Woman in jail for three days. But she claims the judge, not her outift, is the problem.
Garrard District County Judge Janet Booth ordered that Kirsten Arnold be put in jail for appearing in court wearing a tank top, and a thigh-baring pair of shorts. In courtroom video obtained by 27 NEWSFIRST, Arnold and the judge had the following exchange.
Judge Booth Asked, "Why shouldn't I put you in jail for contempt today?"
"I'm sorry," Arnold said.
Booth Replied, "No, you're not, I told you twice. I even fined you for being in contempt. Why shouldn't I throw you in jail today? You apparently don't care about the court's orders.
Arnold told the judge, "I forgot."
The judge then asked Arnold, "How could you forget? No, seriously, how could you forget? It's a complete disregard of court order. Complete. You should go to jail today, and you're going."
"Well, next time I won't wear shorts," Arnold said.
Just before Booth ordered Arnold to jail she told the woman, "I bet you won't."

 
Are shorts appropriate attire for the courtroom?
Yes
No
 

In a jailhouse interview, Arnold told us she thought her outfit was adorable.
Arnold thinks the judge wasn't really bothered by her outfit. She thinks Judge Booth has some sort of vendetta against her."She always picks on me", Arnold claims,"She always has a comment to say about me."
Arnold is even going as far as to say that no matter what she wears the judge will find fault with her. So instead of changing her clothes in the future, she plans to change her judge.
We contacted Judge Booth about the incident. She declined to comment.
Arnold is scheduled to appear in front of Judge Booth again on Monday.
More Stories
Three Year Old Victim's Family Speaks Out

Ramon Harris Released From Hospital

Closed Auto Parts Factory Has Town Considering Bankruptcy

Whooping Cough On The Rise Statewide

 Family Says Mom Didn't Give Alcohol to Teens

Police: Dead Ex-Con Linked To Missing Girl Case

Two Central Kentucky Homes Destroyed By Fire

Investigators Back On Scene Of Industrial Park Fire
Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: grammar, or is it grammer, who cares! as long as you can understand it Location: ky hillbilly on Aug 27, 2008 at 08:44 AM
why do people want to slam each other over misspellings or poor grammar! that is childish... English is the toughest language to learn. not everyone was born with the same ability to learn. i give them credit for having the guts to try and get their message across even if they cannot spell well.. i think we all know someone who is very intelligent but cannot spell at all...as for the girl wearing the short shorts, she may only have been born with half a brain.. there is no telling how hard life has been to this girl! Judge not! unless you ARE the judge.. haha
Posted by: B Location: London on Aug 27, 2008 at 08:42 AM
This woman has a total disregard for rules and laws and that is why she is standing before the judge, repeatedly, in the first place. Now she is crying and snotting about how she was treated wrong and is a victim because she has to do her time in jail even though she was adequately warned. Way to go judge! Keep up the good work!
Posted by: Keen Friend on Aug 27, 2008 at 08:18 AM
is what your wearing the point-no-.Theres nothing worse then a high rock dem. bap.No body is worth a [edited] but me,syndrome.Looking down on the world. Fire the judge.tell him or to get a life.
Posted by: Joseph Location: Lexington on Aug 27, 2008 at 08:09 AM
Wasn't there a song called "Poor, Poor Pitiful Me?" This should be the woman's theme song. She's as pitiful as pitiful gets!
Posted by: zack Location: paris on Aug 27, 2008 at 06:31 AM
Well she should have not wore what she had on to court. But I have to say I would have liked to saw her that day in what she had on she was really hot. I also think Tracey is right what about the little kids dressed the way they are. Ms.Booth just needs to chill out she needs to get the chip off of her. I thought we lived in the U.S.A we are the land of the free. She was not hurting anyone with what she had on so the is all "BULL".
Posted by: John Location: Harrodsburg on Aug 26, 2008 at 09:40 PM
This is the problem with this country today. The judges think that they can play GOD. Get her for what she was in court for and nothing else. I think the Judge should go to jail. Then maybe all the other judges will learn when to stop. We cant display our ten commandments anymore because of the Supreme court.So how far are we going to let thee judges go.??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Posted by: Stanley Simmons Location: The burbs on Aug 26, 2008 at 09:20 PM
Some of you need to mind your own business and stop pushing your version of morality on others. One size does not fit all.
Posted by: Heather Location: Corbin on Aug 26, 2008 at 09:08 PM
It is a respect thing. I believe you shouldn't wear in a courtroom what you wouldn't wear in church. It is just a pure lack of disrespect and stupidity that a person would wear attire that doesn't show responsibility and dignity into a courtroom when they are on trial. You can bet if I ever get into any trouble I will go into the courtroom dressed like I come straight from church.
Posted by: William Location: seky on Aug 26, 2008 at 08:58 PM
Better is the man who strains to lift a great stone to save him self troubles, Then the man that want move a pebble for peace sake.
Posted by: so tired Location: ky on Aug 26, 2008 at 03:30 PM
so sick of hearing about these people who dont have enough resect for them selves to dress with modesty so get over it and let it go!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Allen Location: Lexington on Aug 26, 2008 at 08:50 AM
Note to mike hunt: first off, your choice of name is quite childish. Secondly, the court system isn't screwed up; people with attitudes like yours is screwed up. There is appropriate dress for court as well as in public. The judge did not abuse any authority. This woman was warned before and she still wore what she wasn't supposed to. That is called CONTEMPT! What part of that don't you and other get? It's no wonder the court system is clogged up. Stupid people like you and other place an undue burden on our courts and judges. Grow up, wise up and get a clue. I guess the last time you got in trouble you were innocent....again..LOL! It's always the law breakers who never side with a judge and I'm guessing that is the case with you.
Posted by: Minnie Location: Frankfort on Aug 26, 2008 at 08:42 AM
In my opinion, she was violating the "integrity" of the court system. Face it! When you appear in court, you are not there for "fun and games". You are there on SERIOUS matters and things should not be taken "lightly". Your dress denotes your attitude. I wonder if this woman's lawyer said anything to her about her shorts before they went into court?
Posted by: Melissa on Aug 26, 2008 at 08:39 AM
Military..thats were she should be forced to go .. she will definatley learn "repect" there... And a bonus,, she would have appropriate clothing on at all times..
Posted by: mj on Aug 26, 2008 at 08:19 AM
do you people really believe that "jail" scares repeat affenders.. She doesn't care..about herself enough to be worried about jail. I, in no way was siding with her.. i just disagree that anything will be gained from her wasting "our" money in jail. I dont really care about the right or wrong of the shorts.. it's up to the judge on that one.. but her punishment will not change her...
Posted by: Allie Location: Lexington on Aug 26, 2008 at 06:49 AM
Everybody needs to read the post from "READ IT AGAIN PEOPLE." It is right on the money...good job! You other people who are defending this woman have probably been in front of a judge because you did nothing wrong....LOL..yeah right!
Posted by: wondering Location: ky on Aug 26, 2008 at 05:39 AM
To Kelly.How did you find time to post a comment?Already spent your check?
Posted by: WHAT Location: IRVINE on Aug 26, 2008 at 12:25 AM
I AGREE WITH THE JUGE 100% AND BY THE WAY JUDGE,YOU ARE A CUTIE
Posted by: mike hunt Location: ky on Aug 25, 2008 at 11:37 PM
this is what happens when ugly people have authority, they abuse their position of power to feel better, the judge knew making this decision would get hype and her ugly face on the news way to go judge , whats next jail time for hairspray
Posted by: green on Aug 25, 2008 at 09:00 PM
This has nothing to do with poverty or the temperature outside. You're not expected to wear Versace to court, just something respectable. I know this woman must own a pair of pants (or even longer shorts) and a short sleeve shirt, and she isn't going to die from heat stroke by wearing them for a few hours.
Posted by: Anonymous Location: harlan on Aug 25, 2008 at 08:51 PM
i am glad that the judge has taken a stance. when you look at society and what it is forcing upon us. its the same judges that upholds a lot of crazy rights. such as taking discipline away from parents
Posted by: Anonymous Location: BELL COUNTY,KY on Aug 25, 2008 at 07:48 PM
I'VE SEEN PEOPLE WEAR LESS THAN SHE DID IN COURT DOWN HERE IN THE BELL COUNTY COURTHOUSE (PINEVILLE,KY)AND THEY DIDN'T GO TO JAIL.
Posted by: mike hunt Location: ky on Aug 25, 2008 at 05:10 PM
This is just another example of how screwed up the Ky court system is, so what if the judge does not like her shorts, she has the right to wear what she wants to, her shorts were not indecent,the judge abused her authority, I bet if more cops, judges etc. ever spent a night in jail they would not be so quick to arrest or put someone in jail
Posted by: Proud on Aug 25, 2008 at 04:31 PM
I believe the problem is that people have accepted "unacceptable" for way too long and it is part of the reason the younger generations have few to no morals about them. You won't see an older person attempt to go in front of a Judge in such dress....they have morals and were raised with higher standards that people actually believed in and upheld. Good Job, Judge! To those of you who uphold the "victim", I'm sure you have had legal issues as well that were most certainly "not your fault", right?
Posted by: Shelia Location: Harrodsburg on Aug 25, 2008 at 04:12 PM
There is a sign on the door before you go into the Garrard County court room that states what you can not wear. Even if there wasn't the girl should have known not to wear what she had on. Maybe somebody in jail can teach the girl how to dress.
Posted by: paul Location: lex on Aug 25, 2008 at 02:47 PM
I think judge booth is kinda cute actually...
Posted by: Stephanie Location: Lancaster on Aug 25, 2008 at 02:45 PM
To mj and all the others without a clue-What will she learn in jail? Maybe she will learn to respect authority. Maybe she will learn that when the Judge ORDERS her not to do something, not to do it.She is obviously not a case of "not knowing any better". She is simply a case of not respecting authority. She believed the Judge would do nothing about it, and she was proved wrong. It really has nothing to do with the shorts, or a “free country” or “oh what about our rights”. It has to do simply with following the orders of the Court. She was ordered NOT to wear that into Court (something she should not have had to be told in the first place) and she decided to do it anyway, so like anyone else who is in contempt of court, she suffers the consequences. I am sure there are people who do not agree with the fines the court imposes on them, but running around crying “It is not fair! What about a free country! My rights! My rights!” doesnt make their fines go away now does it? Same concept.
Posted by: Anonymous Location: harlan on Aug 25, 2008 at 02:15 PM
its all in a persons perception..many may not have thought anything was wrong with what she was wearing.. whats the difference when a woman is showing cleavage? which seems to be the norm.. i have seen people in court looking like bums and nothing has been said.. maybe the woman has no other clothes. the judge should offer to take her shopping!! i think it was PMS on the judges part!!
Posted by: Annie Location: Richmond, KY on Aug 25, 2008 at 02:10 PM
I have to agree with some of the other posters. What a waste of jail space and taxpayer money.
Posted by: Heather Location: Lincoln on Aug 25, 2008 at 02:00 PM
What will this woman learn from jail?...Maybe to respect authority and show respect. She obviously was being a smart aleck. She was warned before. To say she "forgot" was not acceptable. Left behind by the social system? More like has abused the social system and has never been accountable for her actions. Maybe she has never had to work and be responsible for herself and her choices. She willingly broke the law and made the choice to disrespect the judge. It's about time people are held accountable for their choices and actions. She could have spent $1 at Goodwill and purchased something appropriate. She had the money and "chose" to purchase the short shorts. Maybe she should have made a wiser choice in how she spent her (or the taxpayer's ) money.
Posted by: Note to mj on Aug 25, 2008 at 01:02 PM
Some may think this is a failing economy and disasterous social system, but you and I aren't in jail are we? Blame it on the person and not the system. Responsibility for one's actions is what we need. Others cannot be held responsible for the actions of another, unless they are minors (and that's the law unfortunately).
Posted by: S Location: Mt. Sterling on Aug 25, 2008 at 12:59 PM
Respect! That is what is missing from today's society. This young lady has no respect for the court system or anything else and obviously thinks it is a joke that she is appearing in court. What is wrong now is nobody wants to take any responsibiltiy for their own actions. Excuse me, punishing poverty isn't the issue. People as poor as dirt know how to be respectable. We all make mistakes and fall on hard times but obviously this young lady had made numerous trips to the courtroom. She needs to grow up and accept her punishment for what she did wrong. She might want to focus her time on turning her life around so she doesn't end up in front of this judge again. She might look at this as a learning lesson in her life. Sueing somebody isn't the answer but just take the punishment and learn from it. It wasnt' the length of the shorts but the principle of hte situation!!!!
Posted by: Jason Location: Lexington on Aug 25, 2008 at 12:55 PM
She's putting the H-O back in shorts!
Posted by: anonymous Location: western ky on Aug 25, 2008 at 12:44 PM
I feel sorry that she was never taught good manners and respect for authority (or herself). it certainly is NOT acceptable to wear shorts (no matter the length) in a court of law. The judge is wasting her time and our money by putting her in jail for contempt. She's in that courtroom because of disobeying a law, not for her attire....but I still agree that she was disrespectful in her attire.
Posted by: Kathy Location: Paintsville on Aug 25, 2008 at 12:11 PM
Seriously, folks, what country do we live in here? I think it's disgraceful that a judge, someone appointed to uphold the laws and CIVIL LIBERTIES, of this country would put someone in jail for their choice of clothing. This is America. We have the right to wear what we deem appropriate, comfortable, attractive, etc. As Americans, are we to judge, bar and ban the choices of others? I think this judge was out of line. The woman didn't arrive in her underwear or wearing a bathing suit. Her civil liberties give her the right to choose her own clothing. Just as we are required to respect the rights of others in regard to their opinions, so are we expected to respect the rights of others in regard to their attire and personal adornments. Perhaps the woman should show up next time wearing a burkha.
Posted by: Tim Location: Lexington on Aug 25, 2008 at 11:01 AM
This young woman may have finally realized that a judge's order is just that - an order, not a 'request'. A courtroom is not a beach, a playground or a shopping area. Short shorts are completely out of place. It's too bad that the judge had to send this woman to jail, but when she blatantly refused a previous order, the judge had no alternative.
Posted by: anna Location: lancaster on Aug 25, 2008 at 10:57 AM
I did not like the shorts ,i would not wear them the judge would not wear them, but i do not think it is the judges job to impose a dress code .furthermore it has been 90 degrees outside, shorts are appropiate we are not in the big city where fashion is a high priority, we live in the country and lake area arond here and that is how we dress--casual.
Posted by: mom Location: lancaster on Aug 25, 2008 at 09:35 AM
I am so tired of people talking about poverty as an excuse to be stupid!!! Most people came from poverty, it's what you make of it when you grow up. I guess she is not ready to grow up. I think the judge was right in her decision, contempt it the reason she is where she is. Contempt and stupid excuses.
Posted by: Joey Location: Lex on Aug 25, 2008 at 09:09 AM
Just by reading the comments made by people who are siding with the woman and dismissing the judge's actions tells me what kind of demented and uneducated society we live in. Look at the post from "READ IT AGAIN PEOPLE" and whomever posted those comments are right on the money. And for Melissa; BULLYING JUDGES? I think not! You obviously (as well as others who commented here) have had bad experiences due to your own shortcomings. The judge IS NOT your Mommy or Daddy. I find it very hard to say I'm from KY when I read comments from people the likes of you.
Posted by: Renee Location: Corbin on Aug 25, 2008 at 09:03 AM
The post from "read it again people" is absolutely correct. People need to dress appropriately. This has nothing to do with poverty, just good manners.
Posted by: mj on Aug 25, 2008 at 08:33 AM
Punish Poverty... if this woman had not been left behind by a failing economy and disasterous social system, she prob would not have been in the court room at all. This judge had the right to be upset if she had told her once. But the punishment for the crime should be based on the crime, make her take classes, anything but waste money that should be used to create programs to prevent people like this from falling so far into the darkness. Educate KY!...what will she learn from jail.. only more of what got her in this situation to begin with..Judges are going to have to become a little more creative with punishments before we will see change..
Posted by: BLACKSHEEP Location: EVERYWHERE on Aug 25, 2008 at 08:15 AM
PEOPLE, I THINK THE ISSUE HERE IS THE LENGHT OF THE SHORTS. A COURT ROOM IS NOT THE PLACE TO WEAR SHORT SHORTS. IF THE LADY WAS WEARING THE PROPER LENGTH OF SHORTS, I WOULD SAY THE JUDGE WOULD NOT SAY ANYTHING, APARENTLY THIS GIRL HAS BEEN WARNED BEFORE ABOUT HER CLOTHING.
Posted by: READ IT AGAIN PEOPLE! on Aug 25, 2008 at 08:02 AM
The judge DID NOT put her in jail simply for wearing those shorts; she put her in jail for contempt because she had specifically told the woman before that her dress was inappropriate for a court of law. The woman DID NOT heed the judge's orders; hence, she is in jail. Those of you bad mouthing the judge either had bad experiences for being in court yourself or you have no concept of what happens in a court of law. To say the judge is jealous is totally laughable. Why would the judge be jealous of someone who has appeared in court as many times as this woman has? And to Jessica in Richmond; obviously Jason went to a school where grammar was taught the way it was meant to be taught and he paid attention. The term "they wasn't too short" is grammatically incorrect. I could really rip your post apart but you proved our point. By the way Jessica, in your post where you ridiculed Tabatha for her spelling, you used the word "gonna" versus "going to." I rest my case.
Posted by: Jodi Location: Nicholasville on Aug 25, 2008 at 07:07 AM
Any person with ANY sense at all knows that you DO NOT wear these kind of clothes to court. I am glad she went to jail. Grow up.
Posted by: david Location: somerset on Aug 25, 2008 at 06:24 AM
We need more judges like this. This girl is just like most kids of her generation, she has no respect for anyone and no respect for authority! People simply do not want anyone telling them what to do! I say make an example out of her! Maybe this would open the eyes of those just like her.The attitude she has displayed is exactly why the morals of our country have gone to hell!Its only going to get worse so horay to this judge for finally standing up to this twit and putting her in her place!
Posted by: Lex1976 Location: Lex on Aug 25, 2008 at 12:25 AM
Is there a law that says what you must wear to court? If not the judge is full of it and I hope this girl does get money out of it. Larry Flynt wore an American flag as a diaper to court and that was years ago. I don't think there is such a law.
Posted by: Stephanie Location: Lancaster on Aug 24, 2008 at 11:31 PM
"Serious Mom", I applaud your diplomatic approach in correcting the grammatical anomaly we were forced to endure, not once, but twice. I attempted to respond, but I could not come up with kind words, such as yours. :-) (You must have had a 4.0!)
Posted by: Mark Location: Lex vegas! on Aug 24, 2008 at 10:56 PM
Judges just love to kick people while they are down and people wonder why nobody likes judges! Judges are there to ajudicate the law not what a defendant wears! If Booth wants to judge clothing she should be a judge on the The CW's Next Top Model!
Posted by: Matt Location: Frankfort KY on Aug 24, 2008 at 10:52 PM
The displinary committee should remove the judge from the bench! If the judge dosen't like the attire of defendants then proper attire should be provided.
Posted by: Troy Location: Flat Gap KY on Aug 24, 2008 at 09:17 PM
The Judge seems to have a personal conflict with this young lady, and seems to be totally out of tune with these days and times for the real world. Was this Fashion Court???? Was it posted what to wear before entering the court room????
Posted by: Melissa Location: Kentucky on Aug 24, 2008 at 09:08 PM
This is a good example of the BULLYING Judges we have here in Kentucky. Who are always CRUSHING Kentuckians RIGHTS! Look what people wear in LA to Court??? Purple, Pink and Lime Green hair? Halter tops, short shorts, tight smoke paints and 6 inch hills, or Halter top mini skirt dresses. Why is a KY Judge putting someone in Jail, when LA and other Judges all over the USA do not do that? I'd sue the Judge, but what really up-sets me is, this womans Lawer allowing the Judge to treat this lady the way she did. JAIL TIME For SHOTS???? that is B/S!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: kymom Location: lexington on Aug 24, 2008 at 08:53 PM
I guess now she doesn't have to worry about what to wear in court. The slammer provides a nice jumpsuit for you to wear! I hope she looks good in orange!
Posted by: Note to Jessica in Richmond on Aug 24, 2008 at 07:51 PM
Are you really as stupid as you sound on here? Your arguments are totally childish and without the thought process of a mature adult. Grow up or you'll end up like this "fine lady" one day.
Posted by: becky Location: monticello,ky on Aug 24, 2008 at 06:42 PM
the judge done what should be done. this lady must be yhe moist stupied person on earth. she was told not to wear those cloths. maybe to too burnt out on her drugs. too know anything. also if she don't want to have to go in front of this judge anymore maybe she shouldn't break the law.
Posted by: matt Location: lex on Aug 24, 2008 at 04:49 PM
Hey -Judge quit wasting people's time.The courts are slow enough
Posted by: Serious Mom Location: Lexington on Aug 24, 2008 at 02:55 PM
Oh dear me, young Jessica in Richmond. Your high school GPA and the fact that you are attending college are both very admirable. But "her shorts wasn't too short" really is gramatically incorrect. I believe the sentence should read "her shorts weren't too short." And while Jason could have been kinder when he brought to attention your little written blunder, it was not very ladylike to call him a loser. So play nice, kids.
Posted by: Lucy Location: Liberty on Aug 24, 2008 at 01:50 PM
I personally have never been in a court room, but this woman seems to be a repeat offender. You would think she would know by now what the appropriate attire is for a court room.
Posted by: clay on Aug 24, 2008 at 01:45 PM
A ho by any other name is a ho. Somebody needs to educate the other ho's. You can't sue a judge. HO HO HO merry release day
Posted by: david Location: paris on Aug 24, 2008 at 12:30 PM
Would it have been any different if her shorts were hangin and the crack of her rear showing...
Posted by: grumpy on Aug 24, 2008 at 12:18 PM
she said she was dressed cute for the beach not for court leave the judge alone its her court room this foolish lady should learn some respect
Posted by: sally Location: corbin on Aug 24, 2008 at 11:56 AM
its a persons right to wear what they want .she should sue the judge and stand up for her rights this is america
Posted by: Charlie Location: Lexington on Aug 24, 2008 at 11:50 AM
After watching the videos. She should stay in jail until she understands that the reason she is in this mess, it is over the drugs. You do not show up to court dressed like that. You are not going on a date or to a picnic. Her choice to put herself in this situation. Why is this news ? This girl needs some help.
Posted by: Anna Location: Berea on Aug 24, 2008 at 11:33 AM
She is a person that obviously lacks respect for herself and others. Though it may not be the best we should respect the judicial system. And come on what kind of a person takes drugs into a court room in her purse? It is about time someone makes an example out of someone and hopefully one day more people will have more respect and dress more appropriatly for court room hearings.
Posted by: Paul Location: Lex on Aug 24, 2008 at 11:19 AM
Several years ago I had to appear i court. I lived 5 miles from the courthouse ad had to walk it all on a very hot july day. I showed up in shorts and a tank top. The judge informed me, i was dressed in appropriately and to never appear that way again. I only had to be told once. Kudo's to judge booth, there is a sanctity to legal procedings and respect that should be afforded to the bench.
Posted by: Mary Location: ky on Aug 24, 2008 at 11:18 AM
Shorts may not be appropriate for a court room but since when is a judges nasty and hateful comments like judge judy makes? shouldn't judges be setting examples and not making an a** out of themselves? those courtroom tv shows have no business on tv.
Posted by: J Location: SOMEWHERE on Aug 24, 2008 at 10:00 AM
I AM NOT HER JUDGE THE GOOD LORD ABOVE IS SHE SHOULD HAVE BEEN CHARGED FOR THE CRIME SHE COMMITTED,NOT FOR THE CLOTHES SHE WAS WEARING.PEOPLE WEAR SHORTS TO CHURCH FUNERAL'S ALMOST EVERYWHERE WHY NOT COURT,SEEMS LIKE WE NEED A DRESS CODE EVEN IN OUR HOME'S.
Posted by: Sandra Location: Lexington, KY on Aug 24, 2008 at 09:44 AM
Okay, she didn't make the best choice of clothing in this instance. But throw her in jail? Maybe the judge should pay for every dime it cost the state/county to house her jail. I mean seriously, she made a bad choice on clothing, she didn't deserve jail time. She isn't dumb, she isn't stupid or anything else. The judge made a bad call here. She's in the position to be a JUDGE of law... NOT fashion police... come on people!
Posted by: Dave Location: Garden Springs on Aug 24, 2008 at 09:36 AM
O but she forgot what the judge told her the last time she was in court, it was an honest mistake.
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 24, 2008 at 09:36 AM
well, she WAS hot, so it was ok! right?
Posted by: Anonymous Location: Corbin on Aug 24, 2008 at 09:32 AM
Adorable... is for babies and children. Grow up Kirsten and put some clothes on!!!! I have been in court... not for myself but because of having custody and raising some one else's child. You should see what some of these dead beat moms and dads thinks is suitable attire for court. Hooray for Judge Booth!!
Posted by: Fashionista Location: Richmond on Aug 24, 2008 at 09:15 AM
The girls does appear to be a candidate for sterlization. However, this is what passes for 'tough law and order' these days? It's good to know that our judicial system knows where to keep their priorities. Short shorts, jail time! Run down a girl with your car and leave her for dead, hey we need a couple of minor traffic violations from you (yes, the crimes are in different counties). Let's not forget that you Garrad county tax payers footed the bill for her jail time. Still clapping now? Great, I have a friend in Nigeria who needs your help with some money problems. It is interesting to note how many posters on this story seem as if they have an abundance of their own history in court rooms. Also, let me offer a little advice to "JM - Lawrenceburg". If you find yourself quoting from the likes of CARLOS MENCIA, it's time to quickly step away from your keyboard and go outside and play.
Posted by: david Location: lex on Aug 24, 2008 at 08:46 AM
who cares what people where in court. this judge and everyone else needs to back the heck off. I have worn shorts to court before and nothing. I have never heard from anyone or ever saw in any court the judge comment on someones clothing.
Posted by: billy Location: harlan on Aug 24, 2008 at 08:38 AM
i think the lady had no respect for the judge.she should have to pull three days
Posted by: Shari Location: Richmond on Aug 24, 2008 at 08:18 AM
Obviously Ms. Arnold is not new to the court room. She must like it there to keep going and defying the judges orders. Have some respect for your attire when going in front of a judge. She has bigger problems now than her shorts since she took drugs in her purse to court too!! How stupid is that?? Everyone knows NOT to take drugs or weapons to court. Keep up the good work Judge Booth, I'm behind you 100%.
Posted by: Bill on Aug 24, 2008 at 08:11 AM
You have no rights in Ky. Courts,nor will you find fair law,practiced there.Democrat Bap. would put us under Islamic type laws, if they could get away with it.Its the Boss Hogg's way.Fire the Judge,free us.
Posted by: lynn Location: wallingford on Aug 24, 2008 at 02:09 AM
the only thing i can say is maybe the judge didnt look as good as she thought.the judge acted like a total -itch,the court is a public place.ive never known there to be a dress code. i think the judge should give herself a goodlook in mirror she doesnt own the court room ,just hears cases. she shouldnt jail someone for what wear.seams the judge did act like she had a grudge of some kind.
Posted by: ls Location: KY on Aug 24, 2008 at 12:31 AM
I think she should have listened to what the judge told her previously. However, I am not going to be so quick to side with the judge. I would have had to have been there to decide. I know that some of these judges and people in authority like to shove their weight and think they know everything. Sometimes common sense should be used. Which is probably what this girl should have used. .....But gosh! Americans are losing all of their freedoms.
Posted by: Paige Location: stanford on Aug 23, 2008 at 11:26 PM
I think the judge made the right decision. Use common sense, a courtroom is not the place to wear shorts and a tank top. Not only that but then she had more drug related charges added after she was arrested! She took drugs with her to court! How ignorant can one person be?
Posted by: Me Location: Perry on Aug 23, 2008 at 10:27 PM
Dean - I think that would be time well spent and justly deserved!
Posted by: wayne Location: morehead on Aug 23, 2008 at 09:31 PM
Guess we don't have rights anymore! Guess America isn't a free country, so the judge points out! parents can't even let their children wear clothes with pin holes anymore, if people of so called power, have the right to tell us what to wear, then maybe they should start forking over the cash for the clothes they want people to wear. this is just about stupid!
Posted by: Jane Location: Morehead on Aug 23, 2008 at 09:19 PM
Obviously Arnold is not very bright. Yes, this is America, but there is still certain protocol to follow. You wouldn't be allowed to show up nude for example. Sometimes poor taste is a crime.
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 23, 2008 at 08:46 PM
While I don't think shorts and a tank top are an appropriate choice for a court appearance, I think putting the woman in jail is a bit harsh. If the woman wants to wear shorts, so what...really it should be her choice how she wants to look...she is a grown woman! This judge needs to stop worrying about what the woman is wearing. I cannot even imagine throwing someone in jail for this...what a waste of space! Okay, let's release criminals, and put someone in jail for wearing a revealing outfit...yeah, makes perfect sense!
Posted by: Jenn Location: Berea on Aug 23, 2008 at 08:11 PM
I do not agree with Megan from Mt Sterling. There is a reason that this girl has been in court more than once. She apparently has been spoiled all of her life and never taken any responsibility for her own actions. It is not the lawyers job to tell her if she looks appropriate enough to go before the judge. She doesn't need a babysitter. She should know better than to come to court wearing something like that, especially if she has already been fine for it previously.
Posted by: Jennifer Location: Berea on Aug 23, 2008 at 07:57 PM
I think that everyone should have the right to wear what they want as long as it is approriate. In my opinion short shorts and tank top is not appropriate for showing up in court. She should have listened to the judge the first time and she wouldnt be where she is now. She said that she "forgot". How could she forget if she has alredy paid a fine on what she is in contempt for.
Posted by: Jackie on Aug 23, 2008 at 07:56 PM
I applaud Judge Booth and would love to shake her hand! Come on people, this lady is making her third appearance in the court – what is wrong with that picture – why was she there to begin with? For the person who believes the country is becoming more like a communist state – are you serious? It’s obvious you have no idea of the freedoms you have and enjoy every day in this county and obviously have no respect for the judicial system either, you must be a friend of the lady in shorts. Here’s to Judge Booth – keep up the GREAT work!
Posted by: Debi Location: Lancaster on Aug 23, 2008 at 07:27 PM
I guess what she is in court for is far less important to you 'moral police' out there in the backwards county i live in....jeez...so what she was wearing shorts...I guess a dress or skirt to her knee's is ok in the bible belt....Um...so....can a man wear shorts? How about these farmers that come into court smelling of manure... I have no problem with them..nor should you..or with her choice of dress..yup..we are still supposed to have a choice.
Posted by: Bubba Johnson Location: Stanford on Aug 23, 2008 at 07:10 PM
Couldn't really see how cute she looked like she claims. Crying? There's no crying in contempt of court cases! What a dummy. She should save those shorts for wearing at the Richmond Mall.
Posted by: SUE Location: KY on Aug 23, 2008 at 06:37 PM
She was told not to dress like that again and what did she do. She done what she wanted to. What did she think that the judge was stupid and forget what she tells people. I don't think so. She was asking for it. If you ask for something you are going to get it. and she ask for it and she got it.
Posted by: out Location: rage on Aug 23, 2008 at 06:26 PM
judge booth acted out against the girl and should be tooken from the judges bar,,,a total b#$%h
Posted by: Kelly Location: Eastern on Aug 23, 2008 at 05:01 PM
Judge Booth has a problem handling her power. Many women that are given power often cannot handle it and they abuse it. She really should be fired. This is a total waste of tax payers money, but it looks like most of the individuals that comment on here are not contributing members of the tax base or they would not have the time to spend on the internet all day. The gov't does not take taxes out of your welfare check.
Posted by: A Location: L on Aug 23, 2008 at 03:55 PM
It seems the women judges these days focus more on their personal opinions than the reason they are behind the bench in the 1st place. Of course no on respects your minor court that your just there for because you smoked a joint or ran a stop sign. It would be like respecting a vice principal in high school. Your only even there because of rules no one consulted you about when they made them. Littlone all the cops and judges and senators that kill and rob millions every year but dont even lose their jobs.
Posted by: Nellie Location: CORBIN on Aug 23, 2008 at 02:57 PM
THANK YOU JUDGE. I BELIEVE THAT YOU ACT ACCORDING TO THE WAY IN WHICH YOU DRESS.OBVIOUSLY THE CLIENT HAS NO RESPECT FOR THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND SHE WAS DISPLAYING THAT IN HER TASTE OT DISTATE IN CLOTHING.
Posted by: Johnny Law Location: Richmond on Aug 23, 2008 at 02:25 PM
I'm in court all the time. I for one wish there were more judges that would step up and do the same. It's not a matter of the shorts, it's a matter of showing respect to the court and to the judge. I saw one judge order someone out of the court room to change into more appropriate courtroom clothing and told the individual that if he wasn't back in court by the time court was over, he would be held in comtempt. If the poor girl was told over and over not to wear those clothes, why would she? That's just a slap in the face to the judge and the girl should have been held in contempt. I agree with a previous poster....if you wouldn't wear the outfit to Church or to a funeral, why would you wear it to court?
Posted by: Molly Location: Bloomfield on Aug 23, 2008 at 02:04 PM
I guess dressing like a ho is finally a crime in Kentucky. it's about time!
Posted by: Chris Location: Lexington on Aug 23, 2008 at 01:58 PM
I dont know im mixed on this one. She was told before to not wear that attire so I see why she was put in jail but jails are overcrowded and putting people in jail for that is senseless. But im not a judge.
Posted by: Tabatha Location: Corbin on Aug 23, 2008 at 01:46 PM
CLAP, CLAP, CLAP FOR THE JUDGE. The Judge did what she needed to due. When appearing in Court you show look you best, Don't dress down you need to dress up. Have RESPECT for the Court my friend.
Posted by: K Location: Lexington, KY on Aug 23, 2008 at 01:37 PM
Wimper and Whine "It's not fair!" Life's not fair. Parents this is what you get when you don't RAISE your kids. Adults with the mentality of a 12 year old. Save the "cute" shorts for the bar!
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 23, 2008 at 01:03 PM
She was in court over harassment charges, as well as criminal trespassing, and leaving the scene of an accident. This woman apparently even knocked over a tombstone IN a Cemetary, and then drove off without a care in the world that she had just disrespected someones dead. Figures though, if she has no respect for the living, why would she respect the resting place of the dead?
Posted by: Serious Mom Location: Lexington on Aug 23, 2008 at 12:50 PM
Consistently ignoring rules results in loss of priviledges. I work on this with my 6 year old every day. This young lady is still learning this simple fact of life. The judge's actions were fair and appropriate. I can only hope that my children are faster learners than this unfortunate young woman!
Posted by: Mom Location: KY on Aug 23, 2008 at 12:21 PM
I think short shorts should be banned in public. It is sickening to go out anywhere and see these people with half their big, fat *** hanging out of their shorts and their big tree trunk legs, plus their big chest hanging out on top-disgusting. Normal, decent people don't go out in public like that. Nobody wants to see that.
Posted by: Stephanie Location: Lancaster on Aug 23, 2008 at 11:38 AM
OK Booth-bashers, it is not illegal to wear shorts to court--that is not why she went to jail. She went to jail for not following the Court's orders. People go to jail for that everyday. Judge Booth ordered her NOT to dress like that in her court, which she can do, and apparently "adorable girl" "forgot" that those rules applied to her. She went to jail for contempt of court-not for wearing shorts. There is a difference there. Most people have enough common sense and common decency to wear something not so "adorable" to Court. And for those preaching "free country....", would you wear a bikini to Court, or to church? I mean, after all, it is a "free country" right? On second thought, since you are making those ridiculous arguments, you probably see nothing wrong with it and would.
Posted by: j on Aug 23, 2008 at 11:20 AM
Just another sign of the times. Whatever happened to ladies dressing like "ladies"? Any reasonable woman would have enough self respect to dress accordingly. Just because you're proud of your barely covered body doesn't mean that the whole world is just as warped as you. Some of us don't want to see it nor do we want our kids exposed to such behavior.
Posted by: Jessica Location: Richmond on Aug 23, 2008 at 10:58 AM
@ Jason in Richmond.....I graduated high school with a 3.9 gpa and currently a college student. I know grammar, and there is nothing at all wrong with "they wasn't too short." What freaking school did you go to??? You're probably a high school drop out, loser.
Posted by: Sharon Location: Ky. on Aug 23, 2008 at 10:32 AM
Way to go JUDGE BOOTH!!! We need more like you. Some people think that they don't have to follow any rules. I don't feel sorry for the cry baby. Grow up and put some clothes on.
Posted by: whitney Location: lexington on Aug 23, 2008 at 10:03 AM
This judge needs to move on. I dont know why they have so much power anyway all they do is abuse it. Im sure this judge is jealous and ugly
Posted by: Edwin Location: Richmond on Aug 23, 2008 at 10:00 AM
In comment to Joe from Winchester, I do agree that you have the right to wear what you want in this country but you have to admit wearing short shorts to appear in court is just plain disrespect of the legal system and the court. I am not saying that we need a suit or tie in court but one should be presentable when appearing before a judge. The judge also has to make sure that court orders are followed or a mockery would be made of them. So what the judge did is right.
Posted by: rc Location: Lexington on Aug 23, 2008 at 09:51 AM
Key phrase in the courtroom video, "....She is not working". Who is supporting this poor scantly-clad child? Maybe WKYT, trying to one-up the second place stations. Just kidding, but I wander Who called the newsroom? Oh Ms. Roberts, shame on you for saying, disrespect is another way of saying you are showing too much skin. I am a layman, and respect is respect, you should know that, it has no situational conditions.
Posted by: Missing The Point Location: Nicholasville on Aug 23, 2008 at 09:37 AM
I agree that shorts and a tank top are not appropriate dress to enter into a courtroom. However, just because the defendant seems to lack basic rules of etiquette and possibly social skills too, I don't think that is sufficient cause for jail time at our expense. I don't know of a law that requires one to be dressed professionally when entering a courtroom. I am not bashing the judge because I know I too would be put out with the idiots they must deal with on a daily basis. I just think she over reacted on this one.
Posted by: Dean Location: Floyd on Aug 23, 2008 at 09:02 AM
I just cannot hold my opinion any longer. Have these people never watched any of the court shows on TV? Everyone that appears there are wearing enough clothes to cover up their bottoms. Maybe the judge should sentence her to watch reruns of TLC's "What Not To Wear" during her stint in the slammer.
Posted by: JustMe Location: lexington on Aug 23, 2008 at 07:35 AM
Come on someone....Tell us what she was doing in court in the first place and why is she there more than once??????
Posted by: Don Location: Williamsburg on Aug 23, 2008 at 06:49 AM
CLAP,CLAP, CLAP FOR THE JUDGE.If i was going to court for some offense,i would want to impress the Judge,look like a pilliar of the community.Not dress like i was there to pick up man. I wish i could vote for you Judge.
Posted by: Debbe Noonan Location: Lancaster on Aug 23, 2008 at 06:14 AM
Having dealt with clients and the courts, these adults act like children and need to be disciplined in order for them to "get it". The judge did what she needed to do to get this woman to pay attention, and she is still acting like a child... not taking any responsibility for her behaviors!
Posted by: joe Location: winchester on Aug 23, 2008 at 03:16 AM
i believe you should wear what you want its america or did you forget you have rights.... what a bunch of idiots.....
Posted by: JM Location: Lawrenceburg on Aug 23, 2008 at 01:41 AM
Dear Kirstie, You sit in jail due to your stupidity. As Carlos Mencia would say, "dee dee dee!" By the way, I'm a twenty-something male, so it's not like I don't notice pretty girls and their clothes and what not. But seriously, the law of the Commonwealth should and did take precedence here. Judge Booth was well within here right to issue this order. The end. -JM from Lawrenceburg
Posted by: Jen Location: LBURG on Aug 23, 2008 at 01:39 AM
I have to agree with the judge on this...YOu need to show more respect at court. I doubt she is jealous of this druggie...nothing to be jealous of...Its just the respect thing..More people need to have it..How do you forget what not to wear when you are called out on your outfit before this...COME ON
Posted by: marie Location: pikeville on Aug 23, 2008 at 12:31 AM
I bet if it had been a person busted for drugs, they would have had a slap on the wrist and sent home...
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 23, 2008 at 12:20 AM
This country is becoming more like a communist state every day.
Posted by: Hmmm Location: Eubank on Aug 23, 2008 at 12:07 AM
After watching the video, I have to say it is her fault and she should have went to jail. She had been fined and warned. She has no respect for authority or laws. She appears to be a spoiled child whom has not ever had to be responsible for her own actions. Has either always gotten her own way or gotten off the hook one too many times. If she was only ask to wear more clothing, no problem. She wouldn't be in jail if she had. Rebellion is a hard rock to get over.
Posted by: Sue Location: Winchester on Aug 22, 2008 at 11:41 PM
It seems some people have no common sense. Common sense tells you that you don't go to court dressed in short shorts. I feel strongly that people should be able to express themselves in the clothes they choose to wear, but you must use common sense. Some people's lack of common sense in clothing is the reason that we have to adhere to dress codes in the first place. So the rest of us lose our freedom to dress the way we want because a few prople don't have the decency and common sense to know what to wear in different settings. There is a time and place for everything and the courtroom is a place where you should dress like an upstanding citizen especially if you are on trial. Even, if she lacked the common sense to know that; she already knew what was expected of her and she should have heeded the judges prior warnings. I have no pity for her at all.
Posted by: Anonymous Location: nancy ky on Aug 22, 2008 at 11:38 PM
why would anyone think it was ok to wear a tank top and shorts to court. you should trying to make a good impression not a bad one.
Posted by: Jason Location: Richmond on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:53 PM
@ Jessica in Richmond... "they wasn't too short" Learn better grammar before you rip into someone for spelling something wrong. I think the judge did what was right. If this dumb chick had been told once before not to do this and she shows up all hooched out once again...she's right where she SHOULD be. Or so some people can understand a little better... "She weren't right for coming in they court like that"
Posted by: Once and for all... on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:50 PM
You people that are defending the girl instead of the judge just don't get it. Do you understand how many times she has been in court? That means she has done something wrong numerous times. The judge didn't bring her there, she brought herself there through stupid actions. Get a grip; the judge is right. And...who the heck calls themselves "adorable" unless they are a self centered, in love with themselves, little arrogant beeeotch?
Posted by: Lindy on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:49 PM
How could a grown woman not remember what a judge told her about her clothes especially when she put on those shorts that morning, get real. Some think that wearing outfits like that make them look good because people are looking at them, did she ever think it's because people can't believe she is wearing such things. There is a way to dress nice and still look sexy.
Posted by: Megan Location: Mt. Sterling on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:44 PM
I agree with Jessica from Richmond about her saying that Judge Booth was just jealous. But I also think that Ms. Arnolds' laywer should have meet her long before the trial to make sure that her outfit wasn't revealing and that Judge Booth would aprove of it.
Posted by: Rhonda Location: Eastern Ky on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:32 PM
I work in the court system, also. We definitely need more Judge Booth's! I agree with her 100%! Judges, Attorneys, & court personnel are required to dress appropriately for court and "DEFENDANTS" or "CRIMINALS" such as Ms. Arnold happens to be, should be held accountable also. People (defendants, criminals, whatever you want to call them) should show respect for the court system whether they agree or not.
Posted by: stan Location: mt sterling on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:22 PM
the judge is mad cause she cant pull the look off. so she sent the girl to jail..
Posted by: Ruth Location: Winchester, Ky on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:20 PM
If the short shown body parts sticking out. The Judge, should order her out of her court room. In contempt is more for, not coming to trial, or a ticket. Wearing shorts is not a crime,they are clothes to.People wear then every day. I think the Judge, don't like shorts, or didn't like Kirsten.The Judge shouldn't be making commets about her, only about cases. I don't think, she should have to go,before that Judge again.
Posted by: Billy Location: Lancaster on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:02 PM
It sounds like some of you people have no respect for the courts or the laws. Do away with law and what is right, and see how long you will last. You people that think this is wrong will be the first ones on the court house steps trying to get help from the court, if something goes wrong in your life. If you don't think this is true, look and see of the comments that are against this; many of them will not even sign their names.
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:41 PM
grow up juge
Posted by: green on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:37 PM
Never beent to court myself but I would NEVER wear shorts and a tank top there. Apparently she had already been warned twice. "She forgot." Right. The judge wasn't picking on her. I believe she would have reacted the same way to anyone who had already been warned TWICE about their dress. What happened to common sense? It isn't that hard to figure out what to wear to court.
Posted by: Flabergasted on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:29 PM
We have men and women fighting and giving their lives so we can live in a free country and then we have a judge who abuses her power in a case like this. No wonder our jails are so full we have to let the real criminals out early due to overcrowding. Maybe Ms. Booth should join Joan Rivers and the red carpet this year and be a real fashion police woman. I agree her choice was not appropriate but neither was her sentence. Jails are for those who break the law, not rules.
Posted by: Robin Location: Kentucky on Aug 22, 2008 at 08:55 PM
I thought you are to respect your elders. People have forgotten how to redpect there elders these days. They have even forgotten how to have respect for themselves. They don't even wear anything modest anymore.
Posted by: Daisy Duke Location: Lancaster on Aug 22, 2008 at 08:41 PM
Judge Booth is obviously not one of my fans! Though I certainly wouldn't wear nut huggers or Coochie Cutters to court.
Posted by: Birdlegs Location: Lexington on Aug 22, 2008 at 08:29 PM
If she wasn't in court in the 1st place none of this would have happened. I was brought up to respect the court. Dresses, skirt and ties. It appears that you are taking it seriously and court is serious. It is awful what people wear to court.
Posted by: Sheila Location: richmond on Aug 22, 2008 at 08:19 PM
This girl obviously has no brains!!! She deserves to be locked for just being plain STUPID !!! What a waste of a human being!!! This is what welfare checks buy --trashy clothes!!!
Posted by: Anonymous Location: mount sterling on Aug 22, 2008 at 08:10 PM
What a waste of tax payers money. This judge is out of control. The State is releasing inmates everyday for no reason while this Judge is sending this woman to jail for short shorts. Give her a fine and send her on her way. This Judge can use this on her reelection platform as Tough on Fashion
Posted by: Mark Location: Berea ky on Aug 22, 2008 at 08:02 PM
ok maybe it is just me but a while back a lex judge turned a man accused of murder free to go to a dr apt and he never showed back up and that isnt the first time that has happened in the past but then they turn around and put a woman in jail for her clothes yea ok that makes tons of scens to me i mean come on lex judges need to get there pritortys stright come on now judge booth the girl cant help it cause she looks better than u get a life judge booth and grow up i mean come on now we out of 3rd grade here
Posted by: Free as the rest Location: Lancaster on Aug 22, 2008 at 07:21 PM
My Gosh people. There are dress codes everywhere and there is a reason for them. They aren't disputed in other places, so why are they disputed here? We play our "against freedom" cards so often anymore, no wonder people don't understand respect as much as they used to. If she had respect to begin with, maybe she wouldn't even be in front of a judge.
Posted by: Jill Location: Covington on Aug 22, 2008 at 07:01 PM
Have a little respect and a little common sense. I mean if you want to make the best impression in court so your outcome is what you want it to be, then wear something decent and respectful. How stupid is this woman? Duh!!
Posted by: john Location: siler k.y. on Aug 22, 2008 at 06:43 PM
people should repect the court room in dress nicely
Posted by: kk Location: ky on Aug 22, 2008 at 05:59 PM
Sounds like a 3 year old trying to push the limits she needs to grow up and show some respect! We even have stores which say no shoes, no shirt, no service. and if the court posted the dress code it should have been followed.
Posted by: Michele Location: Danville on Aug 22, 2008 at 05:52 PM
Ms. Arnold is at fault, there is a place and time for certain attire. That was not the place to be wearing that outfit, adorable or not!!! We are the land of the free but use common sense people. Besides, she was already fined for wearing the wrong thing in her court room. I feel we are going to far on the covering up in public, stop selling the clothes then if you can't wear it outside in the public eye, but wear it at the right time and court IS NOT THE RIGHT TIME!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Bobby Tyler Location: Winchester on Aug 22, 2008 at 05:51 PM
There are certain places that you don't wear shorts and a tank top. Would you wear them to a funeral? wedding? church? work?Our society has changed. Shorts and a tank top are casual wear. Going to court is not a casual event.
Posted by: Alice Location: Nicholasville on Aug 22, 2008 at 05:50 PM
It is about time that someone set a standard for dress in our nation . I thank God for judges like this one . It is showing no shame on the girl behalf for court or the judge .
Posted by: Eugene Location: Peasureville on Aug 22, 2008 at 05:47 PM
Maybe if she would quit breaking the law and having to go to court, maybe it wouldn't be a problem.
Posted by: stan Location: mt sterling on Aug 22, 2008 at 05:44 PM
the judge put her in jail because she dont have the body or looks to pull it off. plain and simple..
Posted by: hello on Aug 22, 2008 at 05:42 PM
maybe she should try changing her priorities instead of her clothing. she may not need a judge in the future.
Posted by: Shelly Location: Lancaster on Aug 22, 2008 at 04:55 PM
There is a sign on the door before you enter the courtroom. I have seen it. It tells you what not to where. If she had been warned and fined she should have worn a pants and a more covering shirt. Judge Booth is tough but she is fair! She doesn't just pick on someone. It is Ms. Arnolds on fault, she pushed it too far.
Posted by: lost Location: pikeville, ky on Aug 22, 2008 at 04:48 PM
I thought we stilled lived in the USA where we stilled had freedom of choice , guess I was wrong
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 22, 2008 at 03:59 PM
sue the judge they think they are god and can do what they want im sick of the courts doing what they want and get away with it she should be fired
Posted by: kw Location: Irvine on Aug 22, 2008 at 03:58 PM
I'm wondering if she was related to... or friends with the chick that got kicked out of the Richmond Mall for wearing a shirt... OH! I mean dress...my bad! LOL
Posted by: joe Location: paris on Aug 22, 2008 at 03:53 PM
Morals, vaules and purity. Why is that so hard to instill? Judge Booth is just being a good parent to this lady.
Posted by: Jessica Location: Richmond on Aug 22, 2008 at 03:44 PM
@ TABATHA in Frankfort...before calling someone stupid why don't you learn to spell first??? I've been to court before and in most court cases you can wear what you'd like. She had on shorts and according to where she pointing in the video they wasn't too short. It's summer, and of course people are gonna be wearing shorts. There are some really dumb people leaving comments if they think people should be arrested for what they wear. I think Judge Booth was just jealous.
Posted by: Jay Hawk Location: Fluttering over Kentucky on Aug 22, 2008 at 03:43 PM
What does the judge look like? Young, old, wicked witch. How would she look in the outfit? I'm not trying to be funny. Sounds like jealousy to me. OH! by the way Scott and Randy, get back in the closet. Was the judge wearing an old mangy robe? If so, when was the last time it was cleaned. Did the judge have on make-up? Did her lipstick art resemble the joker? What I'm really saying is all women have their own special way of presenting themselves. It's their right to do so.
Posted by: Scott Location: Nicholasville on Aug 22, 2008 at 02:20 PM
Way to go Judge Booth! It is about time we held people accountable. Respect is a very important part of life and when we get more of it amongst one another, our world might be a better place. Ms. Arnold should take a class in respect and etiquette and maybe then she won't spend som much time in front of the Honorable Judge Booth.
Posted by: K.C. Location: Lancaster on Aug 22, 2008 at 02:16 PM
Of course she should be held in contempt of court. You should dress respectable when appearing in court. People have forgotten how to dress and be respectable citizens. It is a shame!
Posted by: hollie on Aug 22, 2008 at 01:48 PM
we need more judge booths!
Posted by: Jenny Location: SOMERSET on Aug 22, 2008 at 01:06 PM
WHY IS THIS GIRL IN COURT SO MUCH IN THE FIRST PLACE?
Posted by: Heather Location: Lawrenceburg on Aug 22, 2008 at 12:41 PM
WHO CARES! The judge can do what she pleases. There are more important things going on in this world.
Posted by: Joe Location: Stanford on Aug 22, 2008 at 12:12 PM
Respect God,yourself, your family, your elders, those who show you respect and the law. You can't go wrong. When a person of authority makes a request once, makes a demand second and then the third time comes down on you, don't cry, you have already had two warnings. That was one time to many warnings. Grow up-court is for society's law, not a fashion statement runway.
Posted by: Connie Location: Kentucky on Aug 22, 2008 at 11:16 AM
I work in the court system and I am so tired of hearing how everything is someone else's fault, never the defendant's. Grow up and follow the rules - you did it, now deal with it. It's no one's fault but your own!
Posted by: Jan Location: KY on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:56 AM
Hello contempt of court! Next time, wear some clothes like the judge told you to.
Posted by: just me Location: kentucky on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:45 AM
judge needs to quit letting the stupid stuff get to her she's letting her power go to her head. She should be pulled out till she gets her mind together.
Posted by: Jodi Location: Lexington on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:42 AM
It is a COURT OF LAW - not a night club or picnic....you are supposed to dress professionally...maybe she did if she was trying to go for the world's oldest profession! At 28, you should know better!!! Sounds like a conservative jumpsuit is in your future for a long time thanks to your new charge IDIOT!
Posted by: tabatha Location: frankfort on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:31 AM
the judge should not be fired, that was a stupid comment, the women should of wore clothes to court.Court isnt the place to look "good" or w.e. Maybe if she would of wore clothes she wouldnt of disrespected the judge. Plus, jessica if the judge want smart she wouldnt be a judge now would she?
Posted by: Jeb Location: KY on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:29 AM
Who is that shallow to think they look "adorable" in something and would actually tell someone that?
Posted by: JEN Location: LEXINGTON on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:17 AM
WHAT IS THE SUDDEN INTEREST IN APPAREL THESE DAYS? APPEARS TO ME THAT THESE "LADIES" JUST LIKE THE YOUNG LADY ASKED TO LEAVE THE MALL IN RICHMOND...ARE JUST LOOKING FOR A REASON TO... 1. DRAW ATTENTION TO THEMSELVES 2. FILE A LAWSUIT AND GET SOME CASH!!!!
Posted by: Paul Location: Lex on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:11 AM
She's probably in jail for contempt. Cute and adorable, aren't what appearing in court is all about. She disrespected the judge and the procedings, but 3 days is a bit much. All of that being said, Ms. Roberts comment at the end of the piece outlining the charges against Ms. Arnold, in regard to what she was wearing the night she was arrested was as cheap shot, stinks of bias, and has no place in a serious news story. Wkyt your editorial standards have really sunk to an all time low.
Posted by: Randy Location: Corbin on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:10 AM
This woman has no reverence or respect for the law, or for the court. The real surprise is that anyone would be shocked by the Judge's decision. Immodesty is a crime. Put some clothes on!
Posted by: Nan Location: Lexington on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:09 AM
Yeah, nothing is ever her fault, it's everyone elses!
Posted by: susan Location: lancaster on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:06 AM
Having dealt with Judge Booth I can tell you that she treats everyone who comes before her with disdain, so this young lady is just another "hardened criminal" to her. I don't think she likes people at all and really should not be a judge. She's referred to as "the hanging judge" by folks around here.
Posted by: Sandra Location: Lexington, KY on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:00 AM
well, I personally think this is a stupid reason to put someone in jail... and she did have on clothes... as long as she shows up the judge shouldn't care about what she wears!
Posted by: Oh lord. Location: JUSTHERE on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:58 AM
A little historionic on the part of the defendant and the story does no justice to the young lady in the end. She may need a little growing up to start with. Eventhough I hold my own thoughts and opinions regarding the 'Iranian maneuvers' going on in our own state whether in a mall/courtroom or wherever, this young lady is lucky to have gotten three days given her legal history just for shorts. Let's face it, no matter what you or I do, a Judge is a Judge and they can basically do anything they want even if the decision is based on personal beliefs or assumptions. For this, the law has no boundaries due to an uneven playing field. Best wishes, but next time she needs to be more clever and sensible. Besides she was warned and she admitted she was warned. Bad common sense call. In some places we are not as free as we think we should be. Best wishes.
Posted by: K Location: Lancaster on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:50 AM
Judge Booth is probably tired of seeing this woman in her court all the time!!! Kirstie should be more concerned about cleaning up her life, instead of how she feels that the judge is "picking on" her!One way to avoid seeing this particular judge would be to "stay out of trouble"!!!! She needs to grow up and face responsibility for her actions!!!!
Posted by: Note to Jessica on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:47 AM
Why should the judge be fired? She gave the woman two warnings about appropriate dress. Obviously, you don't understand proper dress or etiquette in the courtroom. Also, even if you think you look good in something, you don't refer to yourself or your outfit as "adorable." That just shows conceit, arrogance and a person who is self centered on their looks.
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:30 AM
You're going to court, wear some clothes. You are not in jail for short shorts you are in jail for being stupid!
Posted by: tabatha Location: frankfort on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:26 AM
well first off she probly isnt picking on her, apparently she did somthign to have to go to court. So, in that case maybe she will learn her lesson or better yet who cares..give her a fine and make her work to pay it off
Posted by: Scarlet on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:22 AM
Have some respect for yourself. Since there were illegal drugs found in her purse she has no respect for herself.
Posted by: Jessica Location: Richmond on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:16 AM
Sounds to me like a lawsuit in the making. Judge Booth should be fired. That is ridiculous.
Posted by: Rob Location: Work on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:07 AM
Instead of wanting a new judge, how about wanting to stay out of court? problem solved and she can wear what she wants.
Posted by: RVB Location: Kentucky on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:03 AM
I don't know why this woman is in court but apparently she isn't a court employee or and attorney unless those people have changed their dress code. It sounds like this woman is in "court" quit often if the judge has warned her in the past about her mode of dress. If she doesn't want to be told what to wear in court she needs to stop what ever it is that is causing her to go to court. By the way. There is "Office Attire", "Beach Attire", "Park Attire", "Bar/Club Attire", etc. Ladies and Gentlemen please choose the right clothing for the place you are going. It is only "Common Sense" to do this. I have no problem with what you are wearing as long as it is in the right venue.
Posted by: B2S Location: Garrard County on Aug 22, 2008 at 08:54 AM
Locals know this woman well and the reasons she is a familiar face in court. Disrespect for herself is evident in her disrespect for the court and community values in general. She's the consumate "victim" - nothing is ever her fault and she has an entitlement complex as big as Texas. The judge no doubt is fed up seeing her in court and applied some much-needed tough love (if you can call expecting someone to have the common sense to dress appropriately for court tough). The judge was absolutely right, an example had to be made and the standards of this community had to be upheld. Good job. Keep it up.
Posted by: Me Location: win on Aug 22, 2008 at 08:34 AM
If she was told not to wear that type of clothing and done it anyway then she needed to be taught a lesson. Quit crying and next time wear something appropriate to court!
Posted by: Annette Location: Morgan Co. on Aug 22, 2008 at 08:34 AM
What kind of world are we living in...who are we to tell others what to wear. I understand there are instances where there are dress codes and should be, but when you have a lay person off the street coming in to face a crime.....a dress code is not appropriate. Had she been an employee at the court house, yes....a lay person, no.
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 22, 2008 at 08:30 AM
Why is she in court so much that they know who she is. Maybe instead of changing clothes or judges, she should try changing her lifestyle.
Posted by: Me Location: Lancaster on Aug 22, 2008 at 08:16 AM
Way to go Judge Booth. I agree with you 100%.
Posted by: Melissa Location: Nicholasville on Aug 22, 2008 at 08:00 AM
Would she wear the outfit to church? Probably... some people have NO respect for themselves and feel they must show skin to feel good about themselves. There is a time and place for everything, court should be a place to dress appropriately. Good job Judge Booth.
Posted by: Joey Location: Lex on Aug 22, 2008 at 07:44 AM
Sounds to me like a "Kymberly Clem" wannabe. If the judge already gave her warnings about the way she dressed, the girl is stupid for not heeding those warnings. She says the outfit looked "adorable." This girl is obviously in love with herself. You don't desribe anything about yourself as adorable. Shallow, self-centered and arrogant is what it seems to me. And previously, she didn't have a bra on? She's trolling for a rich husband. I'll be the first to admit that I'll look at a pretty girl, but my God woman, have a bit of respect especially in a court of law and knowing darn well the judge already warned you.
Posted by: Becca Location: Georgetown on Aug 22, 2008 at 07:39 AM
I agree clothing should hit some mark of common sense and good judgement depending on where a person may be but, arrested? Seriously? We'll hit national news again and everyone outside this state will go back to believing the majority of us go around in ankle-length feedsack frocks or bib overalls and cluck our tongues in self righteous judgement over women who don't know their place. If they were truly too short then she showed poor judgement and could perhaps convey a little more class but a judge who incarcerates someone for wearing daisy dukes is a judge who needs some common sense herself.
Posted by: Tracey on Aug 22, 2008 at 07:37 AM
I do not think that they should have put her in jail for her clothes.All that they had to do is just judge her for her crime and then let her go.There are kids out there that their parents let them wear stuff much more shorter than that,now those are the ones that they need to put in jail.At least this was a woman and not a little child.She was old enough to wear stuff like that and they need to let her be they are just mad that they can not look that good in stuff like that.Tell them to go after these parents that buy stuff like that for their kids and letting them go out into public dressed like that,and leave the women alone.
Posted by: Joy Location: Lexington on Aug 22, 2008 at 07:25 AM
Why is she always in court? When you go to court or any place of business you should wear a suit or some kind of slaks and blouse. Your taught that the day you start school. It shows respect for yourself and the people around you. Just because you might find yourself sexy doesn't mean the world does.
Posted by: Bren Location: Kentucky on Aug 22, 2008 at 07:17 AM
Has this person ever thought that maybe the problem isn't what she is wearing or even the judge she goes before? Just maybe the problem is the kind of behavior that gets her sent before a judge time after time. Just maybe it's the behavior that needs to change.
Posted by: Tony Location: Richmond, KY on Aug 22, 2008 at 06:58 AM
Anyone with any sort of common sense should know you shouldn't come to court dressed like a hooch. She's where she needs to be for a few days.
Posted by: arnold Location: london on Aug 22, 2008 at 06:37 AM
don't get on tv and cry and sob and say that you are going to ask not to be in front of that judge again.news flash!!straighten up and stay out of ANY judges court room.....grow up
Posted by: Kelly Location: KY on Aug 22, 2008 at 12:37 AM
She wore those in a court room? Not sure 3 days was enough time to keep this idiot in jail.