New Trial Requested In High Profile Lexington Murder

LEXINGTON, Ky. (AP) - An attorney representing a woman convicted in a high-profile murder in 1986 argued before the Supreme Court that she should get a new trial because she got bad advice from her former attorney.

Karen Brown is serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole for 25 years for her role in a notorious love triangle murder case in Lexington.

Brown, her lesbian girlfriend, Elizabeth Turpin and their friend, Keith Bouchard, were accused of the February 1996 murder of 22-year-old Michael Turpin. Prosecutors said the three plotted Michael Turpin's death for six months to collect $60,000 in insurance money.

Brown and Elizabeth Turpin, who was married to Michael Turpin, were convicted of murder. Bouchard pleaded guilty and testified against the women.

Public defender Marguerite Neil Thomas noted in appeal briefs that Brown's former attorney, Julius Rather of Lexington, did not call a single witness, while Elizabeth Turpin's attorney called 17. He did not question Bouchard's credibility despite evidence of mental illness.

An attorney for the state said Rather probably saved Brown's life by not putting her on the stand. Prosecutors had sought the death penalty for Brown and Elizabeth Turpin.

Assistant Attorney General Todd Ferguson said Wednesday that Rather successfully suppressed part of Brown's confession to police, which would have become admissible for impeachment purposes had she testified.

Michael Turpin's father, Don, said it's the second time Brown's conviction has been before the Supreme Court.

"It's just a continual replay," Don Turpin said. "In the 20 years, they have never brought up a new argument that they didn't make before. It frustrates you and infuriates you that you have to keep going through this."

In 2003, Brown asked Fayette Circuit Judge Gary Payne for a new trial. She said she had no knowledge of the murder plot and thought only that Bouchard would "rough up" Michael Turpin.

Brown said her confession was a lie she made to protect Elizabeth Turpin.

Payne granted a new trial, but the Kentucky Court of Appeals later overruled him. The Supreme Court agreed to consider the case on discretionary review.

The justices seemed skeptical of Brown's story. Justice Mary Noble said "it's a no-brainer" that Brown could come up with a better story after 17 years to reflect on it.

Rather has said that he had a weak case and that he wanted to avoid the death penalty. He has said that he did not question Bouchard's mental stability because he feared that might convince jurors that Brown was the ringleader. And he did not want jurors to hear Brown's confession.

In death penalty cases, "you try not to give them (prosecutors) any peg to hang their hat on," Rather said.

---
Information from: Lexington Herald-Leader, http://www.kentucky.com

(Copyright 2007 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)


You must be logged in to post comments.

Username:
Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by jeri Location: louisville on Feb 8, 2011 at 04:14 PM
    She gave him a life sentence and that's what she should get!
  • by some one who beenthere Location: harlan on Feb 2, 2011 at 05:47 AM
    25years is a long time and love will make you do crazy things @mix drugs with it,anyways it was liz idea @ the man stabbed him I think karen needs a chance at some kind of life.
  • by outraged Location: lexington on Oct 25, 2007 at 03:11 PM
    I agree with everything that "winchester" said except for one important point. Her time is not almost served! She received "LIFE" without the "possibility" of parole for 25 years. Hopefully when she comes up for parole she will be denied! Hopefully she will have exhausted all of her resources for a new trial and she can finally sit in prison without any hope, any dream of getting out. Unfortunately "winchester" is probably right and she probably will get out in a few years and be able to start a new life. That is how backwards or legal system has become. CRIMINALS DO THE CRIME, VICTIMS FOOT THE DIME.
  • by Me Location: winchester on Oct 25, 2007 at 08:57 AM
    Seems that the inmate got the best advice she could get at the time to keep her (edited) from getting executed. Seems she needs to continue keeping her mouth shut after 17 years, lmao, doesn't she realize that she has almost got her time served? Is she so ignorant that she can't subtract to get time remaining? I believe lady that your best bet is to finish your time, get out and live a more productive life instead of ending someone else's life to try and further your own ambitions. I think you deserved the death penalty myself. If you are the cause of someone else's untimely death then you should proceed them with your own! I think it is stupid how our government is set up to help inmates fight the courts at no cost to them. If you are sentenced then you should serve your time and shut up whinning about your treatment. It seems that this case was cut and dried so lady you are guilty fess up and deal with it.
  • by Chuck Location: Bluegrass on Oct 25, 2007 at 07:56 AM
    Cases like this are why our legal system is overloaded. It's time to shut the (jail) door and throw away the key.

WKYT

2851 Winchester Rd. Lexington, Ky 40509 859-299-0411 - switchboard 859-299-2727 - newsroom
Register for Email
RSS Feeds
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 10788326 - wkyt.com/a?a=10788326
Gray Television, Inc.