Consortium Looks For Ways To Limit Carbon Dioxide

FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) - Government leaders joined utility
executives Monday to announce the creation of a consortium that
will pay for research into ways to reduce and manage carbon dioxide
emissions from coal-fired power plants.

The University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research
pulled together the partners, who are expected to spend $24 million
over 10 years to support research into large-scale systems that
would capture carbon dioxide.

Gov. Steve Beshear and UK President Lee T. Todd Jr. made the
announcement. Five utilities will contribute $200,000 a year. State
government will kick in matching funds of up to $1 million a year.

The research, Beshear said, is especially important for
Kentucky, one of the nation's top coal-producing states.

"Given the unique challenges Kentucky faces in a
carbon-constrained world, our state will have to make a concerted
effort to control emissions of carbon dioxide, while recognizing
that coal is a vital part of our energy mix," Beshear said.

Kentucky political leaders have been clamoring for more research
into technologies that will allow coal to remain the key component
in electricity generation. The coal industry employs some 17,000
people in Kentucky.

House Majority Floor Leader Rocky Adkins, D-Sandy Hook, said the
consortium will help Kentucky continue work already under way at
the Center for Applied Energy Research.

"Kentucky, as a major coal producing state, must stay in the
forefront of energy issues and develop technologies to reduce
carbon emissions," Adkins said.

Besides carbon dioxide capture, researchers will also look into
development of new combustion technology for coal and biomass that
could lead to more efficient power production.

Julie Janson, president of consortium partner Duke Energy
Kentucky, said the research is important because "the business of
energy is complex and constantly evolving."

Other members include Kentucky Power Co., E.ON US, East Kentucky
Power Cooperative and the Electric Power Research Institute.

(Copyright 2009 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

You must be logged in to post comments.

Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by William Gilliam Location: Winchester on Apr 28, 2009 at 01:17 PM
    Carbon Sequestration is the answer to the CO2 issue. Put the CO2 back where it came from.
  • by MG on Apr 28, 2009 at 07:47 AM
    I don't get why people are so opposed to making our coal getting processes cleaner. I understand that alot of people depend on coal for thier jobs etc, but if making it cleaner is hurting the industry then that should obviously tell you something right there... I don't approve of Obama's mission to destroy coal mining at this time, but we do need to start winging ourselves off of it and onto something better and more efficient.
  • by Bill on Apr 28, 2009 at 05:13 AM
    How about the gas comming from Washington DC,any hope on cutting that back.Its way more dangerous then carbon dioxide.This stuff is hoax, to gain control of our people.
  • by Howard on Apr 28, 2009 at 04:39 AM
    There is no clean coal tecchnology out there, it is a myth kind of like Big Foot.
  • by steve on Apr 27, 2009 at 08:12 PM
    You are a bunch of stupid fools no we are going to vote you nuts out we have had just about enough of you socialists.


2851 Winchester Rd. Lexington, Ky 40509 859-299-0411 - switchboard 859-299-2727 - newsroom
Register for Email
RSS Feeds
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 43823277 -
Gray Television, Inc.