Judge: Classification Of Sex Offenders Unfair

FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) - Kentucky's system for classifying and housing juveniles who commit sex offenders has been struck down by a judge who ruled that it deprives the youths of proper treatment.

In his ruling Wednesday, Franklin County Circuit Judge Phillip Shepherd said the state Juvenile Justice Department exceeded its authority in creating a system where youths who commit even minor offenses are required to undergo long-term treatment at residential centers.

The judge ordered the department to stop using the placement system and to relocate all youths who are placed inappropriately within 30 days.

The case was brought on behalf of five boys with mental retardation, but Shepherd's ruling applies to any youth in the system whose offense isn't serious enough to require long-term, residential treatment.

Juvenile Justice Commissioner Bridget Skaggs Brown declined to comment on the ruling Wednesday but issued a statement through spokesman John Hodgkin.

"The department disagrees with the judge's ruling," the statement said. "We're still reviewing his ruling and exploring our options."

The ruling was welcomed by public defenders who filed suit challenging the system and by a western Kentucky judge who said the practice violates the spirit of the state's juvenile law, which calls for treating and rehabilitating children at home or as close to home as possible.

"What they are doing is not what's envisioned by the juvenile code," said Christian County District Judge James G. Adams, a former juvenile prosecutor who helped write the updated juvenile law in 1987.

Gail Robinson, an assistant public advocate who filed the lawsuit, said her clients with mental disabilities are extremely frustrated by demands of the program that include discussions, essays, keeping journals and analyzing their behavior.

"They try really hard but they just aren't capable," she said. "None of the kids have ever graduated from this program."

Robinson said she isn't sure how many youths would be affected by Shepherd's ruling but said it would include many youths withoutmental disabilities who simply have committed minor offenses.

Shepherd found juvenile justice officials have begun classifying youths who commit even minor sex offenses, such as fondling, as "juvenile sex offenders," a category under law generally reserved for older children who commit serious offenses such as rape or sodomy. That classification allows the department to send the youths to a secure facility where they are required to enter sex offender treatment programs for up to three years.

But the practice exceeds the legal definition of what constitutes a juvenile sex offender, Shepherd said.

Juvenile justice officials also made no exceptions for youths with mental retardation - even though the law says they may not be classified as juvenile sex offenders, the judge said.
---
Information from: The Courier-Journal,
http://www.courier-journal.com

(Copyright 2007 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)


You must be logged in to post comments.

Username:
Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by Not a sex offender Location: KY on Sep 8, 2007 at 08:01 AM
    keep your own kids locked up if all these juvenile sex offenders are released. Maybe they should be released in Franklin County.
  • by JAY Location: CENTRAL KENTUCKY on Sep 6, 2007 at 11:32 AM
    Is it fair to the victim? How about the potential future victims? Oh well, at least the offender's feelings aren't hurt or they aren't held responsible. That is the primary concern isn't it? We don't want to "unfairly" label anyone do we, after all the only thing they did was to commit a crime. They shouldn't be called criminals for that should they? This kind of thinking is exactly what has put this country in the shape it's in. If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck, let's call it a duck. Period.
  • by Peggy Location: ky on Sep 6, 2007 at 09:28 AM
    If some in the judicial system think it's not fair to have these youths with mental retardation in a program with other juvenile sex offenders,they need to come up with a place to put these offenders.Yes,they are still offenders.No matter what their mental capacity is,if they touch someone in any shape or form in a sexual manner,they're still sex offenders.They need to be somewhere away from th general public.I,for one want my family to be safe from any danger;if we can prevent something from happening,why not?As far as fondling,and these people not wanting theses youths labeled sex offenders-how many sex offendrs started out fondling,to see what they could get away with,and then it progressed into full fledged child molesters,rapists, and murderers.Like the other commented-teach them when they're young.If they have a tough time,so be it.That's still better than some child,or woman being raped later on.
  • by Anonymous on Sep 6, 2007 at 08:52 AM
    Many of the laws applied to adult offenders are equally unfair. Not many folks are willing to defend this group of offenders.
  • by ky Location: ky on Sep 6, 2007 at 07:09 AM
    i think it is fine the way it is if you dont wont somebody else touching your body then it is a sexual offfence, teach them young and then maybe when the are grown they wont become rapist

WKYT

2851 Winchester Rd. Lexington, Ky 40509 859-299-0411 - switchboard 859-299-2727 - newsroom
Register for Email
RSS Feeds
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 9614087 - wkyt.com/a?a=9614087
Gray Television, Inc.