WASHINGTON (AP) - A glaring omission seems to be an important part of a 2 1/2-year Justice Department investigation into whether destroying CIA videotapes of harsh interrogations was a crime.
When the CIA sent word in 2005 to destroy the videos, there was an unusual omission in the carefully worded memo: the names of two agency lawyers.
Once a CIA lawyer has weighed in on even a routine matter, officers rarely give an order without copying the lawyer in. It's a standard way for managers to cover themselves if a decision goes bad.
And the omission was so unusual that a top CIA official noted it in an internal e-mail just days later.
As the probe winds down, prosecutors have focused on a little-used section of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley law.
The law makes it a crime to destroy documents, even if no court has said they must be kept and no investigators are looking for them.
Viewers with disabilities can get assistance accessing this station's FCC Public Inspection File by contacting the station with the information listed below. Questions or concerns relating to the accessibility of the FCC's online public file system should be directed to the FCC at 888-225-5322, 888-835-5322 (TTY), or email@example.com.